Calibration of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments

Authors: Leng, Yan; Dimmery, Drew

Journal: Information Systems Research (2024)

DOI: 10.1287/isre.2021.0343

<jats:p> Machine learning is commonly used to estimate the heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) in randomized experiments. Using large-scale randomized experiments on Facebook and Criteo platforms, we observe substantial discrepancies between machine learning-based treatment effect estimates and difference-in-means estimates directly from the randomized experiment. This paper provides a two-step framework for practitioners and researchers to diagnose and rectify this discrepancy. We first introduce a diagnostic tool to assess whether bias exists in the model-based estimates from machine learning. If bias exists, we then offer a model-agnostic method to calibrate any HTE estimates to known, unbiased, subgroup difference-in-means estimates, ensuring that the sign and magnitude of the subgroup estimates approximate the model-free benchmarks. This calibration method requires no additional data and can be scaled for large data sets. To highlight potential sources of bias, we theoretically show that this bias can result from regularization, and further use synthetic simulation to show biases result from misspecification and high-dimensional features. We demonstrate the efficacy of our…

View in Otero